The Battle for Forced Pregnancy

Our own pompous ass, Senator Lindsey Graham, is scared out of his boots.  So it's not enough for him to brag on what a good shot he is, he has taken his fight against a potential Tea Party challenger -- that must be you, Lee Bright -- to another battle front.  He has come out with barrels blazing against... pregnant women.

I admit, in South Carolina it's a cheap shot.  But it is also true that the man has shown in the past year that there is no depth to which he will not stoop to win re-election.

May 20, 2013 Dear Friends, First and foremost, tax dollars should not be used to fund abortions.   As a strong supporter of the right to life I have again cosponsored Senator Roger Wicker’s (R-Mississippi) legislation, S. 946 the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, to establish a consistent, government-wide prohibition on abortion funding.   This important legislation would make the following policies permanent:   ·         The Hyde Amendment, which prohibits funding for elective abortion coverage through any program funded through the annual Labor, Health and Human Services Appropriations Act; ·         The Helms Amendment, which prohibits funding for abortion as a method of family planning overseas, ·         The Smith FEHBP Amendment, which prohibits funding for elective abortion coverage for federal employees; ·         The Dornan Amendment, which prohibits use of congressionally appropriated funds for abortion in the District of Columbia; and ·         other policies, such as the restrictions on elective abortion funding through Federal prisons.   The House of Representatives passed the bill 251-175 in the 112th Congress, but the legislation was not allowed for a vote in the Democrat-controlled Senate.   The legislation currently has 22 cosponsors in the Senate.  I am hopeful the Senate will take up and force a vote on this important legislation to the pro-life cause. Sincerely,  Lindsey O. GrahamUnited States Senator  To contact me, please click here to visit my website. Please do not respond to this email, the mailbox is unattended. To unsubscribe at any time, please click here.

 You might think that, after all his time in the Senate, he would be secure enough to continue to maintain his facade of reasonableness.  But, like Mark Sanford, I believe Graham knows that there is no sweeter deal than working for the federal government.  And no price is too great to pay to keep that job.  And these days, there is no easier target than women and children.

So while these jackasses continue to pass bills that reinforce the fact that pregnant women are vulnerable and easily controlled, prenatal care will continue to suffer, infant mortality will continue to be shameful, and the future of children born to poverty will continue to be grim.

I sent an email to Lindsey in response to his proud newsletter:

I was 21 when I was fortunate to have legal and safe abortion available to me.  I am now 62 and I am appalled that you believe God has chosen you to control the reproductive choices of my daughter.

Shame on you.

Join me in letting misogynists like Lindsey Graham know that we are out here, we vote, and we are not ashamed.

No Respect

Our own ex-gov. Mark Sanford seems to be a poster child for disrespecting women.  You don't have to look at his poor record as governor when for two terms he fought the hard fight against any program that would give aid to women and children.

You could even say that Sanford's battle is not so much against women, but against people of limited means -- we of the 47 percent, to put it in Mitt Romney terms.

But his misogynistic treatment of his former wife, and even his treatment of his fiancee, scream out the kind of narcissism that insure that, to Mark Sanford, a woman is merely the means to an end, the end being who he sees in the mirror and what he has to gain.

When you listen to his remarks about his many indiscretions, I mean really listen to the words and not the sad face with the teary eyes and all the talk about "his God," what you really hear is how things might affect Mark Sanford.

Jenny Sanford recounts in her autobiography Staying True that at her husband's press conference after his affair became public, despite the tears and the appearance of remorse, he failed to apologize to his wife and sons, nor to thank Jenny for standing by him.  More inappropriate and narcissistic was his call to her after the event to ask her how he did.  Most of us would see that, and his repeated attempts to seek her input and approval, as just plain cruel.  But Mark continued to beg her for permission to continue to see the other woman.  And whining that she just didn't understand.

One would want to believe that his judgment was tainted back then by what was happening to him in his personal life (even though those events were of his own doing), but throughout the current House campaign, we have been hearing bizarre stories like that of him asking Jenny to manage his campaign as she had in the past (and telling her that this time she would be paid for it!!!).  There was the strange acceptance speech the night Sanford won the primary challenge in which he expressed surprise that the "other woman," now his fiancee, had turned up to celebrate his win.  And now we learn that one of the sons who was on stage at the event had not ever met the woman with whom they were sharing the stage.  As Jon Stewart might say, "Awk-ward."

And cold and uncaring.

Lately we have word that he has several times trespassed to enter Jenny's home, and that in March she decided to pursue the matter legally.  And Sanford's response to this is to accuse, well everyone involved in making it public, of political motivation, as though we the people have no right to know about such behavior from someone running for office.  

What we get from Mark Sanford in response to all these incidents is the type of depressive and pathetic whining that amounts to, "Why are you all picking on me?"

He has tried to blame the most recent trespassing event on the fact that Jenny was not home, leaving their 14-year-old son unsupervised.  Because, as you know, Mark Sanford is all about being there for his children.

There is a disconnect here that is disturbing.  Mark Sanford's reflection goes no further than how an action will reflect on him, and not ever whether it is right or wrong.  Whether it is leaving the state without alerting state officials of his whereabouts or lying about his affairs, Sanford is unable to do the right thing when it interferes with his needs and impulses.  And when it's over, he is unable to see what he did that was wrong.

The fact that Mark Sanford on primary night referred to "my God" was jarring.  It truly emphasized the extent to which Sanford filters his entire world through the lens of his own needs, and that it is indeed his world.

Depression is the flip side of anger.  Without going all psychobabble here, I will say that Sanford's depression looks a lot like what he feels when his attempts to manipulate the women in his life fail.  His idea of a swell relationship with his ex-wife seems to be happily running his campaign, giving him free access to her home, and supporting him in his campaigns and in his love life.

And the continued errors in judgment he has made that involve his wife, and his attempts to spin the errors, point to a man who can never be trusted to do the right thing.  Or even to understand when he has done the wrong thing.

Which pretty much explains why on earth after being laughed out of the Governor's Mansion at the end of his term he would imagine we would want him back.